Visitors   Views   Downloads

The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential

View preprint
258 days ago
RT @RELenski: Preprint "The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential" by @Mik…
259 days ago
RT @RELenski: Preprint "The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential" by @Mik…
RT @RELenski: Preprint "The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential" by @Mik…
RT @RELenski: Preprint "The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential" by @Mik…
RT @RELenski: Preprint "The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential" by @Mik…
RT @RELenski: Preprint "The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential" by @Mik…
RT @RELenski: Preprint "The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential" by @Mik…
RT @RELenski: Preprint "The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential" by @Mik…
RT @RELenski: Preprint "The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential" by @Mik…
259 days ago
RT @RELenski: Preprint "The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential" by @Mik…
Preprint "The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential" by @MikeWiser2 @emilyldolson @AnyaEVostinar me @CharlesOfria https://t.co/A49WzZnshr First step extending Mike's work w/ #LTEE to #Avida https://t.co/BoPr8Foqlv
259 days ago
The Boundedness Illusion: Asymptotic projections from early evolution underestimate evolutionary potential https://t.co/Zeke4Ax96K
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Analysis script (to be run in R) that reads in the raw data and outputs all figures and analyses

There is no legend; this is an analysis script.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27246v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Michael J Wiser conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Emily L Dolson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Anya Vostinar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Richard E Lenski conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Charles Ofria conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://github.com/mjwiser/ALifeOEE2018

Funding

This research was supported in part by the BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action (NSF Cooperative Agreement No. DBI-0939454), NSF Award No. DEB-1655715, and Michigan State University through the computational resources provided by the Institute for Cyber-Enabled Research. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies