Visitors   Views   Downloads

Extreme degeneracy of inputs in firing a neuron leads to loss of information when neuronal firing is examined

View preprint
RT @KunjVadakkan: I published a corrected version of a pre-print article titled "Extreme degeneracy of inputs in firing a neuron leads to l…
A revised version of my preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/pGviXcrN7L #Biophysics #ComputationalBiology #Neuroscience
I published a corrected version of a pre-print article titled "Extreme degeneracy of inputs in firing a neuron leads to loss of information when neuronal firing is examined" https://t.co/L13RDRBSld
I published a pre-print article titled "Extreme degeneracy of inputs in firing a neuron leads to loss of information when neuronal firing is examined" https://t.co/L13RDRBSld
84 days ago
Extreme degeneracy of inputs in firing a neuron leads to loss of information when neuronal firing is examined https://t.co/D5a9IRnQru
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

U.S. patent: number 9477924 pertains to an electronic circuit model of the inter-postsynaptic functional LINK.

Author Contributions

Kunjumon I Vadakkan conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Patent Disclosures

The following patent dependencies were disclosed by the authors:

U.S. patent: number 9477924 dated October 25, 2016

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data/code is included in the manuscript (In section 2.2 titled "Degeneracy of inputs in firing a neuron", calculation of sets of combinations are included.

Funding

This work was supported by Neurosearch Center, Toronto. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies