Visitors   Views   Downloads

A review of adhesives for entomotaxy

View preprint
RT @AshWhiffin: @Simon_Robson69 @Billmansfield8 @Bugsstuff yeah this is new info: https://t.co/yfI71xsOxC
@Simon_Robson69 @Billmansfield8 @Bugsstuff yeah this is new info: https://t.co/yfI71xsOxC
@flygirlNHM @EntoProf Was directed to this recent article on adhesives used in collections from the ECN2018 feed https://t.co/TkiUaxYGkL
34 days ago
@balcaen https://t.co/4qn7Ki89Cn no clear answers yet it seems
34 days ago
@AshWhiffin @EntCollNet I don’t remember, here is the link to the paper https://t.co/4qn7Ki89Cn
34 days ago
@RunxiWANG_ https://t.co/4qn7Ki89Cn
RT @EntCollNet: Also, here is the preprint accompanying the talk: Deans AR. (2018) A review of adhesives for entomotaxy. PeerJ Preprints 6…
RT @EntCollNet: Also, here is the preprint accompanying the talk: Deans AR. (2018) A review of adhesives for entomotaxy. PeerJ Preprints 6…
34 days ago
RT @EntCollNet: Also, here is the preprint accompanying the talk: Deans AR. (2018) A review of adhesives for entomotaxy. PeerJ Preprints 6…
RT @EntCollNet: The conclusion of the talk is that more research needs to be done, but here is the preprint accompanying the talk: Deans AR…
RT @FrostMuseum: Thank you! Check out the full paper here: https://t.co/ceupPfP0XZ https://t.co/7vWuqDKiyp
The conclusion of the talk is that more research needs to be done, but here is the preprint accompanying the talk: Deans AR. (2018) A review of adhesives for entomotaxy. PeerJ Preprints 6:e27184v1 https://t.co/vwabgCQkeI https://t.co/ARxBRBPrYf
Also, here is the preprint accompanying the talk: Deans AR. (2018) A review of adhesives for entomotaxy. PeerJ Preprints 6:e27184v1 https://t.co/vwabgCQkeI
Thank you! Check out the full paper here: https://t.co/ceupPfP0XZ https://t.co/7vWuqDKiyp
90 days ago
RT @FrostMuseum: Our adhesives in entomotaxy review preprint was published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/Wj2q0SsJCd #specimens #Bio…
90 days ago
RT @FrostMuseum: Our adhesives in entomotaxy review preprint was published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/Wj2q0SsJCd #specimens #Bio…
Deans AR. (2018) A review of adhesives for entomotaxy. PeerJ Preprints 6:e27184v1 https://t.co/UzlbmwsPTC
RT @FrostMuseum: Our adhesives in entomotaxy review preprint was published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/Wj2q0SsJCd #specimens #Bio…
RT @FrostMuseum: Our adhesives in entomotaxy review preprint was published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/Wj2q0SsJCd #specimens #Bio…
94 days ago
RT @FrostMuseum: Our adhesives in entomotaxy review preprint was published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/Wj2q0SsJCd #specimens #Bio…
RT @FrostMuseum: Our adhesives in entomotaxy review preprint was published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/Wj2q0SsJCd #specimens #Bio…
RT @FrostMuseum: Our adhesives in entomotaxy review preprint was published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/Wj2q0SsJCd #specimens #Bio…
RT @FrostMuseum: Our adhesives in entomotaxy review preprint was published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/Wj2q0SsJCd #specimens #Bio…
RT @FrostMuseum: Our adhesives in entomotaxy review preprint was published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/Wj2q0SsJCd #specimens #Bio…
Our adhesives in entomotaxy review preprint was published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/Wj2q0SsJCd #specimens #Biodiversity #Entomology More on this soon!
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Andrew R Deans conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The Pennsylvania State University's ScholarSphere institutional repository.

DOI: 10.18113/S1393P

https://doi.org/10.18113/S1393P

Funding

This review was inspired by the results of an Institute of Museum and Library Services-funded and Foundation of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works (FAIC)-administered Collections Assessment for Preservation (CAP) grant (2018). These funds were not used, however, to produce this review. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies