Visitors   Views   Downloads

Characterization and Comparative Genomics Analysis of two Bacillus megaterium lytic bacteriophages

View preprint
102 days ago
PJpreprint: Characterization and Comparative Genomics Analysis of two Bacillus megaterium lytic bacteriophages https://t.co/QiVfbx69hp
102 days ago
Characterization and Comparative Genomics Analysis of two Bacillus megaterium lytic bacteriophages https://t.co/Ruc2U2lo7S
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

Abdoallah Sharaf conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Miroslav Obornik prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Adel Hammad conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Sohair El-Afifi conceived and designed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Eman Marei conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

KT995479, KT995480

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code (please explain).

Funding

This work was supported by the project Centre for research of pathogenicity and virulence of parasites“ (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000759) funded by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MEYS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies