Visitors   Views   Downloads

A look back at the quality of Protein Function Prediction tools in CAFA

View preprint
RT @iddux: A look back at the quality of Protein Function Prediction tools in CAFA https://t.co/fSri9X9gl3 via @PeerJPreprints
22 days ago
A look back at the quality of Protein Function Prediction tools in CAFA https://t.co/fSri9X9gl3 via @PeerJPreprints
22 days ago
Quality Assurance of AFP tools in CAFA https://t.co/fSri9X9gl3 via @PeerJPreprints
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Morteza Pourreza Shahri performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Madhusudan Srinivasan performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Diane Bimczok conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Upulee Kanewala conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Indika Kahanda conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://github.com/MSU-STLab/BioInfoQA.git

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies