Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Periwinkle experiment raw data

Raw data of snail climbing heights in the presence or absence of predator chemical cues. Sheet 1 is the metadata, highlighting the collection locations, cue types and height descriptions. Sheet 2 is the data from the single population experiments, and Sheet 3 is the mixed population treatments.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27160v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

John M Carroll analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Morgan B Church conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Christopher M Finelli conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is included in the manuscript in the supplements.

The raw data are provided in a Supplemental File.

Funding

This work was partially funded by UNCW and the Center For Support of Undergraduate Research and Fellowships (CSURF) at UNCW. There was no additional external or internal funding for this research. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies