Visitors   Views   Downloads

Testing the FAIR metrics on data catalogs

View preprint
RT @AgBioData: Paper of Interest: Testing the FAIR metrics on data catalogs https://t.co/VhZLrLJiBP #FAIRdata
RT @AgBioData: Paper of Interest: Testing the FAIR metrics on data catalogs https://t.co/VhZLrLJiBP #FAIRdata
RT @AgBioData: Paper of Interest: Testing the FAIR metrics on data catalogs https://t.co/VhZLrLJiBP #FAIRdata
12 days ago
Paper of Interest: Testing the FAIR metrics on data catalogs https://t.co/VhZLrLJiBP #FAIRdata
RT @keesvanbochove: We published #FAIR Data catalogue comparison between @CKANproject @dataverseorg @inveniosoftware preprint today in @Pee…
111 days ago
RT @keesvanbochove: We published #FAIR Data catalogue comparison between @CKANproject @dataverseorg @inveniosoftware preprint today in @Pee…
RT @keesvanbochove: We published #FAIR Data catalogue comparison between @CKANproject @dataverseorg @inveniosoftware preprint today in @Pee…
112 days ago
RT @keesvanbochove: We published #FAIR Data catalogue comparison between @CKANproject @dataverseorg @inveniosoftware preprint today in @Pee…
112 days ago
RT @keesvanbochove: We published #FAIR Data catalogue comparison between @CKANproject @dataverseorg @inveniosoftware preprint today in @Pee…
RT @keesvanbochove: We published #FAIR Data catalogue comparison between @CKANproject @dataverseorg @inveniosoftware preprint today in @Pee…
RT @keesvanbochove: We published #FAIR Data catalogue comparison between @CKANproject @dataverseorg @inveniosoftware preprint today in @Pee…
RT @keesvanbochove: We published #FAIR Data catalogue comparison between @CKANproject @dataverseorg @inveniosoftware preprint today in @Pee…
We published #FAIR Data catalogue comparison between @CKANproject @dataverseorg @inveniosoftware preprint today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/luCVvoSTQn #WorldWideWebandWebScience @TheHyveNL. All have their strengths & weaknesses but great step towards #FAIRdata implementation.
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Data Catalog FAIR metrics assessment

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27151v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The Hyve provides professional software services for several of the data catalog applications in this article.

Jarno van Erp, Carolyn D Langen, and Kees van Bochove were employed by The Hyve at the time of writing and editing the manuscript, and Anca Boon was also contracted by The Hyve.

Author Contributions

Jarno A A van Erp conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Carolyn D Langen conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Anca Boon authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kees van Bochove authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The FAIR metrics review on which the scoring in the article is based can be found in the Supplementary File.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies