Visitors   Views   Downloads

Social media uptake of academic publications: Differences due to availability, subject and demographic parameters

View preprint
240 days ago
Social media uptake of academic publications: Differences due to availability, subject and demographic parameters https://t.co/86nLrGvLNH
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Social media uptake of norwegian publications - raw data

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27135v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Marta Lorenz conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Susanne Mikki conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is provided in supplement 1 :ALL_entries_for submissionanonymous.xlxs

The raw data contains 12 fields:

PubYear: Publication Year

Artikkelid: Unique Id for each article. Anonymized for publication.

Personidentifier: Unique author ID. Anonymized for publication.

Kjonn: Gender. K= woman; M= man; empty= no information given

Fodt_aar: Year of birth; empty= no information given

DOI: 1= article has DOI; 0=Article has no DOI

OA: 1= open available; 0= not open available; See methods section for definition of open availability

Number of X: Number of mentions in one of the four services: news, blogs, twitter, facebook posts

NPI fagområde: Subject; empty= no information given

Funding

This work was funded by the National Library of Norway through project # 14c94a46: Forskningskommunikasjon i endring. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies