Visitors   Views   Downloads

Terrain determinants of permafrost active layer thermal conditions: a case study from Arctic deglaciated catchment (Bratteggdalen, SW Spitsbergen)

View preprint
121 days ago
Terrain determinants of permafrost active layer thermal conditions: a case study from Arctic non-glaciated catchment (Bratteggdalen, SW Spitsbergen) https://t.co/h8p5Lr7o3j
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.
Highlighted in Geomorphometry 2018

Supplemental Information

Correlations between ground temperatures and tested parameters

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27119v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Marek Kasprzak conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Mariusz Szymanowski conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The table consists correlation results between maximum and average ground temperatures at different depths and tested land-surface and solar radiation parameters.

Funding

The paper is a contribution to the National Science Centre project: ‘Spatial and temporal controls on active layer dynamics in an Arctic mountain valley’ award no. 2015/19/D/ST10/02869. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies