Visitors   Views   Downloads

A Tournaisian (earliest Carboniferous) conglomerate-preserved non-marine faunal assemblage and its environmental and sedimentological context

View preprint
RT @PCI_Paleo: #FossilFriday #paleontology #preprint Scanning Electron Micrographs of charcoal fragments from the earliest Carboniferous o…
RT @PCI_Paleo: #FossilFriday #paleontology #preprint Scanning Electron Micrographs of charcoal fragments from the earliest Carboniferous o…
RT @PCI_Paleo: #FossilFriday #paleontology #preprint Scanning Electron Micrographs of charcoal fragments from the earliest Carboniferous o…
RT @PCI_Paleo: #FossilFriday #paleontology #preprint Scanning Electron Micrographs of charcoal fragments from the earliest Carboniferous o…
353 days ago
RT @PCI_Paleo: #FossilFriday #paleontology #preprint Scanning Electron Micrographs of charcoal fragments from the earliest Carboniferous o…
353 days ago
RT @PCI_Paleo: #FossilFriday #paleontology #preprint Scanning Electron Micrographs of charcoal fragments from the earliest Carboniferous o…
#FossilFriday #paleontology #preprint Scanning Electron Micrographs of charcoal fragments from the earliest Carboniferous of Scotland, from Clack et al. (2018) in @PeerJPreprints: https://t.co/f4fM8J0gQz #OpenScience https://t.co/T9E54coi8q
375 days ago
A Tournaisian (earliest Carboniferous) conglomerate-preserved non-marine faunal assemblage and its environmental and sedimentological context https://t.co/HHodVzShsj
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Microfossil data

A list of micro fossil specimens used in the faunal analysis.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27102v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jennifer A Clack conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Carys E Bennett conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Sarah J Davies conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Andrew C Scott performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Janet Sherwin performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Timothy R Smithson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ge4t18smipfehid/Dryad%20data%20Clack.zip?dl=0

This link is to the micro-CT scan data for the three specimens that have been scanned

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council UK, Consortium grants: NE/J022713/1 (Cambridge), NE/J020729/1 (Leicester), and a Leverhulme Trust Emeritus Fellowship to J. A. Clack EM-2016-038. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies