Visitors   Views   Downloads

Scientific research in Neotropical protected areas: themes and gaps

View preprint
382 days ago
Scientific research in Neotropical protected areas: themes and gaps https://t.co/h5cImSmMmH
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Dataset used to analysis

(1) Contains the total PAs of Neotropical region. (2) The selected PAs for sample. (3) The artciles collected for each PA selected. (4) Names of species found in titles and keywords.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27086v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Elizabeth C Teixeira conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jayne S Santos conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, approved the final draft.

Maxwell R G Silva conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Ana CM Malhado authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Richard J Ladle contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Vandick S Batista conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The database we built consists of information available on https://www.protectedplanet.net/ and Web of Science database collected as described on the article. Our files present only the selection that we used, also described on our methodology.

Funding

This study was supported by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq (V.S.B., grant number 303469/2013-7); and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - Capes. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies