Scientific research in Neotropical protected areas: themes and gaps

Laboratório de Conservação e Manejo de Recursos Renováveis/Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil
Laboratório de Ecofisiologia Vegetal/Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil
Laboratório de Biologia Marinha e Conservação/Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil
Laboratório de Conservação no Século XXI/Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.27086v1
Subject Areas
Biodiversity, Conservation Biology
Keywords
biodiversity, bibliometrics, protected areas, scientific production
Copyright
© 2018 Teixeira et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Teixeira EC, Santos JS, Silva MRG, Malhado AC, Ladle RJ, Batista VS. 2018. Scientific research in Neotropical protected areas: themes and gaps. PeerJ Preprints 6:e27086v1

Abstract

Protected areas are often used by scientists to observe natural processes and organisms in habitats that have been minimally influenced by human actions. In contrast to many PA objectives, their effectiveness for promoting and supporting scientific research can be easily quantified in terms of quantity and quality of scientific products (primarily peer-reviewed articles) that are based on research within a PA’s boundaries. In addition to their contribution to global scientific knowledge, these research products may support local conservation efforts and contribute to park management, monitoring and governance. Here, we investigate the effectiveness of Neotropical PAs at supporting scientific research based on data from the World Database of Protected Areas (WDPA). Specifically, we randomly selected 102 PAs from each designation from the Latin American and Caribbean region, to give a total of 612 PAs. A total of 444 PAS did not return any results and only 30 were associated with more than 10 publications. Research topics varied widely in the PAs in our dedicated sample, but we found an evident trend to research related to geosciences and paleontology. Conservation and biodiversity were secondary subjects. there seems to be a lack of influence of PAs type and presence of management plan on scientific productivity. On the other hand, we have seen that most areas do not present a management plan, the absence of which makes it more difficult to assess the effectiveness of these areas.

Author Comment

This is a submission to PeerJ for review.

Supplemental Information

Dataset used to analysis

(1) Contains the total PAs of Neotropical region. (2) The selected PAs for sample. (3) The artciles collected for each PA selected. (4) Names of species found in titles and keywords.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27086v1/supp-1