Analysis of the mixture toxicity burden in 17 rivers in north eastern Australia – implications for the Great Barrier Reef.

Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.27046v1
Subject Areas
Ecotoxicology, Environmental Contamination and Remediation, Environmental Impacts
Keywords
mixtures, concentration addition, pesticides, hazard
Copyright
© 2018 Spilsbury et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Spilsbury F, Warne MSJ, Backhaus T. 2018. Analysis of the mixture toxicity burden in 17 rivers in north eastern Australia – implications for the Great Barrier Reef. PeerJ Preprints 6:e27046v1

Abstract

The Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is a protected ecosystem, listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site since 1981. It runs for approximately 3000km along the coastline in north-eastern Australia. A total of thirty-five major river basins discharge to the GBR and many transport large loads of pesticides, suspended sediment, nutrients from agricultural land. Over the past 6 years an extensive program has been conducted by the Queensland Government to monitor concentrations of 51 pesticides and their breakdown products in 17 rivers that discharge to the GBR. To explore the potential impact that the pesticides pose to the riverine environments and to the GBR we analysed the risk posed by the individual pesticides and their mixtures. Australia currently does not have water quality guidelines for 17 of the 38 pesticides detected. For those, we calculated ecotoxicity thresholds using a simplified version of the Australian methodology for determining water quality guideline values, based on species-sensitivity distributions. In all rivers, multiple pesticides were routinely detected at concentrations greater than their level of reporting. All rivers had at least one sample where the combined toxicity was greater than 1 toxic unit (TU), i.e. exposure situations where the total pesticide concentration exceeded acceptable levels. In a number of rivers more than 50% of samples had a combined toxicity greater than 1 TU. Average TU’s per river ranged from 13.47 to 0.10, with substantial fluctuations over the seasons but without clear trends between years. The patterns indicate that specific events such as severity of wet/dry seasons and cyclone events impact the combined toxicity found. We also found land use patterns affected the combined toxicity in the river ecosystems. In each of the rivers, 90% of the expected mixture toxicity was caused by only between 2 and 6 pesticides, although the individual pesticides that dominated the combined toxicity differed between rivers.

Author Comment

Poster presented at the 2018 SETAC conference in Rome.