NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Time course transcriptional profiles of putative laccase genes in G. lucidum

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26982v1/supp-1

Distribution of putative cis-acting elements in the promoter region of gene Lacc1-Lacc16 upstream 2000 bp of the start codon

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26982v1/supp-2

Raw data about the gene expression of laccase genes and the activity of laccase

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26982v1/supp-3

Primer pairs designed for qPCR analysis

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26982v1/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Xincong Kang analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Yuewen Chen performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Sien Yan performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft.

Luman Zeng analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Xuehui Liu contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Yongquan Hu performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Yunlin Wei authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Xiuling Ji authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Dongbo Liu conceived and designed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements are provided in the supplementary Table S1,Fig. S1 and Fig. S2.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. 81773850). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads