Visitors   Views   Downloads

Choice of choice models: Theory of signal detectability outperforms Bradley-Terry-Luce choice model

View preprint
Our preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/F0RLQbssXn #MathematicalBiology #Neuroscience #PsychiatryandPsychology. Shows unequivocal superiority of models for proportions base on normal link rathe than log likelihood Mata-analysts beware
This report cfs two different theoretical frameworks for modelling decision-making: those based on the theory of signal detection & those based on Bradley-Terry-Luce Choice models. 18 binary response data sets are used to decide ... Guess what happened?- https://t.co/GOdgYkMQ0l
19 days ago
Choice of choice models: Theory of signal detectability outperforms Bradley-Terry-Luce choice model https://t.co/fKjCxVLVb0
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Raw Proportions Meeting Criteria for All studies

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26978v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Diana E Kornbrot conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

George J Georgiou conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Mike Page conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This study is an additional analysis of raw data from studies that have ethical approval.

Open-Science-Collaboration. (2015, 2015-08-28 00:00:00). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. DATA. Science Retrieved 2-Oct-2017, 2017, from https://osf.io/ezcuj/wiki/Replicated%20Studies/

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

EXCEL file with one sheet for each study

All sheets have columns

StudyID study identification as in Tables 1,2

Nmax number of opportunities

pno participant ID number

freq frequncy meeting criterion

according to design

w1, w2, etc for any repeated measures

b1, b2, etc. for any between group measures

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies