1 Citation   Views   Downloads

Which method is more accurate? or errors have error bars

View preprint
RT @LindorffLarsen: @jchodera Thanks for the tip. This one from @janhjensen is also nice https://t.co/efIJCtYeMy
RT @LindorffLarsen: @jchodera Thanks for the tip. This one from @janhjensen is also nice https://t.co/efIJCtYeMy
@jchodera Thanks for the tip. This one from @janhjensen is also nice https://t.co/efIJCtYeMy
337 days ago
RT @janhjensen: My article 'Which method is more accurate? or errors have error bars' was one of the top 5 most viewed #Biophysics and #Mam…
RT @janhjensen: My article 'Which method is more accurate? or errors have error bars' was one of the top 5 most viewed #Biophysics and #Mam…
RT @janhjensen: My article 'Which method is more accurate? or errors have error bars' was one of the top 5 most viewed #Biophysics and #Mam…
337 days ago
My article 'Which method is more accurate? or errors have error bars' was one of the top 5 most viewed #Biophysics and #MamaticalBiology articles published in @thePeerJ journal in 2017!
RT @janhjensen: @davidlmobley Cool idea. Would you consider this preprint for a best practises article or is this bit too far afield? http…
RT @janhjensen: @davidlmobley Cool idea. Would you consider this preprint for a best practises article or is this bit too far afield? http…
372 days ago
@davidlmobley Cool idea. Would you consider this preprint for a best practises article or is this bit too far afield? https://t.co/XA0XrIyNCL
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jan H Jensen conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate, collect or analyse any raw data or code.

Funding

The author received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies