NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Data and code to run case study on alligator diet

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26884v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Brian C Stock conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Andrew L Jackson conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Eric J Ward conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Andrew C Parnell conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Donald L Phillips conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Brice X Semmens conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

GitHub

https://github.com/brianstock/MixSIAR

CRAN

https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MixSIAR

Funding

Funding was provided in part by the Cooperative Institute for Marine Ecosystems and Climate (CIMEC) and the Center for the Advancement of Population Assessment Methodology (CAPAM). BCS received support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE‐1144086. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
9 Citations   Views   Downloads