Visitors   Views   Downloads

Assessing the efficiency of eDNA metabarcoding for documenting patterns of metazoan communities in the Arctic.

View preprint
Assessing the efficiency of eDNA metabarcoding for documenting patterns of metazoan communities in the Arctic. https://t.co/S2nEIIgGas
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Noémie Leduc performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables.

Louis Bernatchez conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Philippe Archambault conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Kimberly Howland conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.

Antoine Dispas performed the experiments, zooplankton datas.

Gesche Winkler zooplankton datas.

Anaïs Lacoursière Roussel conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Licence to Fish for Scientific Purposes provided by the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code since it is only an abstract publication.

Funding

This work was supported by ArcticNet and Polar Knowledge Canada. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies