Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Individual values for mucosal to serosal ratio (M)

Individual values for the morphology and mucosal to serosal ratio (M) for the different intestinal sections calculated using Kisielinski et al. (2002) for control mice and treated with either 1 or 4 doses (each dose = 560 µg protein) of perivitelline fluid of the eggs of Pomacea canaliculata.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26790v1/supp-1

Intestinal disaccharidases activities

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26790v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Matías Giglio conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Cintia Garro conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Enrique Caviedes-Vidal conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Horacio Heras conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All animal procedures adhered to institutional animal use regulations and approved animal use protocols by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Universidad Nacional de San Luis (UNSL), protocol number B205/15,and were carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, 2011).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data or code.

Funding

Funding was provided by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Técnica, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, the National Science Foundation (IOS-1025886 to ECV), Consejo de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET PIP834 to ECV), Universidad Nacional de San Luis (CyT 2-0814 to ECV). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies