Agronomical, biochemical and histological response of resistant and susceptible wheat and barley under BYDV stress

Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Prospect, Tasmania, Australia
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Bangladesh
CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australia
Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.26764v1
Subject Areas
Agricultural Science, Virology
Keywords
Virus infection, Resistance genes, Phloem, BYDV, Phenol
Copyright
© 2018 Choudhury et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Choudhury S, Hu H, Larkin P, Meinke H, Shabala S, Ahmed I, Zhou M. 2018. Agronomical, biochemical and histological response of resistant and susceptible wheat and barley under BYDV stress. PeerJ Preprints 6:e26764v1

Abstract

Barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV (BYDV-PAV) is one of the major viruses causing a widespread and serious viral disease affecting cereal crops. To gain a better understanding of plant defence mechanisms of BYDV resistance genes ( Bdv2 and Yd2 ) against BYDV-PAV infection, the differences in agronomical, biochemical and histological changes between susceptible and resistant wheat and barley cultivars were investigated. We found that root growth and total dry matter of susceptible cultivars showed greater reduction than that of resistant ones after infection. BYDV infected leaves in susceptible wheat and barley cultivars showed a significant reduction in photosynthetic pigments, an increase in the concentration of reducing sugar. The protein levels were also low in infected leaves. There was a significant increase in total phenol contents in resistant cultivars, which might reflect a protective mechanism of plants against virus infection. In phloem tissue, sieve elements (SE) and companion cells (CC) were severely damaged in susceptible cultivars after infection. It is suggested that restriction of viral movement in the phloem tissue and increased production of phenolic compounds may play a role in the resistance and defensive mechanisms of both Bdv2 and Yd2 against virus infection.

Author Comment

This is a submission to PeerJ for review.

Supplemental Information