Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Chi-squared statistical tests that compared gecko shelter preference in Conspecific versus Heterospecific trials

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-1

Raw data of Mean frequencies of geckos choosing one of the three shelter types

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-2

Raw statistical analysis that supported results of field data

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-3

Statistical analysis of field data comparing shelter types

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-4

Raw data of gecko shelter preference comparing conspecific versus heterospecific trials

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-5

R code that went into the making of the graphs and figures

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-6

Raw data that went into making the error bar plot of mean frequency of geckos found on one of the six shelters

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-7

table of substrates that had zero geckos using them

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-8

Gecko prevalence on one of the three types of shelter from field survey

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-9

Raw data that went into field data plot

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-10

Raw data that supported a Chi- squared test for independence of gecko shelter choice preference taking human disturbance into account

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-11

Statistical data that went into plots of gecko shelter choice in field survey

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2675v1/supp-12

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Ferris Eric-Hisham Zughaiyir conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, no other authors.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

I worked with University of California Berkeley's UCB

INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC), Protocol # AUP-2015-05-7549.

Work followed UCB Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol # AUP-2015-05-7549) permission to work with animals is provided by class protocol followed by the attestation (providing evidence I was in class and therefore had permission to work with vertebrates along the IACUC Protocol) .

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

I worked with University of California Berkeley's UCB

INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC), Protocol # AUP-2015-05-7549.

Work followed UCB Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Protocol # AUP-2015-05-7549) permission to work with animals is provided by class protocol followed by the attestation (providing evidence I was in class and therefore had permission to work with vertebrates along the IACUC Protocol).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a supplementary file.

Funding

The author received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies