An index to integrate stress due to anthropogenic pressures along the shoreline and case study of a tourist destination in Brazil
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Ecology, Biological Oceanography
- Keywords
- Brazil, Environmental Pressure Index, stressors, rocky reefs
- Copyright
- © 2018 Casares et al.
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2018. An index to integrate stress due to anthropogenic pressures along the shoreline and case study of a tourist destination in Brazil. PeerJ Preprints 6:e26706v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26706v1
Abstract
In order to compare stress on marine coastal ecosystems at different sites and over time we developed an Environmental Pressure Index (EPI). The index was composed of twenty-four parameters which could be observed and quantified at each site or from maps. The parameters metrics were taken in water, on shore or from the catchment and were grouped into eight ecosystem degrading stressors: Urban development, shoreline development, presence of sewage outfalls, presence of human debris, constructions on the shore, nautical gas stations, fishing pressure, recreational activities and nautical and shipping activities. The parameters were standardized to a maximum and had different weighting established from the literature, giving an EPI which varies from 0 to 1. We applied the Index to the tropical rocky shores and marginal reef ecosystem of the Armação dos Búzios, a tourist destination situated on a peninsula in Southeastern Brazil. The region has experienced rapid urbanization since the 1950s. Data were obtained for 11 sites and the Index was calculated for 2000/2001 and compared to data generated in 2016/2017. In 2000/2001 EPI varied from 0.01-0.47 and in 2016/2017 from 0.04-0.55 and although some sites worsened others improved and no significant difference in EPI was found over time for the region.
Author Comment
This is an abstract which has been accepted for the WCMB