NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version

Supplemental Information

RFsp — Random Forest for spatial data (R tutorial)

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26693v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Tomislav Hengl is employed by the Envirometrix Ltd., Wageningen, Gelderland, Netherlands (http://envirometrix.net; from 1st of February 2018). Marvin N. Wright is employed by the Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen (https://www.bips-institut.de/en/the-institute/departments/biometry-and-data-management/statistical-methods-in-genetics-and-life-course-epidemiology.html).

Author Contributions

Tomislav Hengl conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Madlene Nussbaum conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Marvin N Wright performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Gerard B.M. Heuvelink analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft, mathematical syntax checking.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://github.com/thengl/GeoMLA

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
9 Citations   Views   Downloads