NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Ripening levels of Cape gooseberry fruits

A dataset with information about color spaces (A) RGB, (B) SVM, and (C) L * a * b *, corresponding to seven ripening levels of Cape gooseberry fruits.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26691v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Wilson Castro conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jimy Oblitas conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, approved the final draft.

Miguel De-la-Torre conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper.

Carlos Cotrina performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Karen Bazán performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Himer Avila-George analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Supplemental file

The raw data/code is uploaded as a supp file.

Funding

This project was partially supported by Investigation and innovation area, Vicarrectorado of investigation, Universidad Privada del Norte (Perú); and Cátedras CONACYT (México) - Fortalecimiento de las capacidades de TICs en Nayarit, Project number 2143. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
2 Citations   Views   Downloads