Visitors   Views   Downloads

Why is nonword reading so variable in adult skilled readers?

View preprint
@maxcoltheart @thePeerJ https://t.co/yIczaDftLt
Why is nonword #reading so variable in adult skilled readers?New paper by @maxcoltheart https://t.co/Y64rKMdMRI
RT @maxcoltheart: Our preprint "Why is nonword reading so variable in adult skilled readers?" has been published today in @PeerJPreprints h…
RT @maxcoltheart: Our preprint "Why is nonword reading so variable in adult skilled readers?" has been published today in @PeerJPreprints h…
RT @maxcoltheart: Our preprint "Why is nonword reading so variable in adult skilled readers?" has been published today in @PeerJPreprints h…
201 days ago
RT @maxcoltheart: Our preprint "Why is nonword reading so variable in adult skilled readers?" has been published today in @PeerJPreprints h…
201 days ago
Why is nonword reading so variable in adult skilled readers? https://t.co/5MIVgXG7L0
Our preprint "Why is nonword reading so variable in adult skilled readers?" has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/4eOmCum93F #CognitiveDisorders #PsychiatryandPsychology. Comments very welcome.
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Max Coltheart authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Anastasia Ulicheva analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data from Pritchard et al. already publicly available

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257938878_111020NonwordReading

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies