Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplmentary Figures and Tables

Supplementary tables and figures. Specimens numbers, locality information and GenBank accession numbers for Choerophryne specimens included in analyses (Table S1); GenBank accession details for outgroup samples (Table S2); genetic distance data for species and candidate lineages (Table S3); and summary data on body, elevational distribution and calling height for Choerophryne (Table S4). Bayesian tree for all samples (Figure S1); Trait evolution in the major lineages of Choerophryne estimated using BEAST (Figure S2); and summary of museum records for Choerophryne grouped by phenotype (Figure S3).

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2663v2/supp-1

Supplementary File 2

Appendix S2. BEAST input file for ancestral state analyses

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2663v2/supp-2

Supplementary File 3

Appendix S3. Treefile for chronogram estimated in BEAST with ancestral states.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2663v2/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Paul M Oliver conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Amy Iannella performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Stephen J Richards conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper, collecting all material and feild data.

Michael S.Y Lee conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

As this work involved museum preserved material ethics approval was not sought.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

GenBank. These will be accessioned upon acceptance of paper, and relevant details added to the supplementary files

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a supplementary file.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Australian Research Council to Paul Oliver, a McKenzie Postdoctoral fellowship to Paul Oliver from Melbourne University, and grant from the Australia Pacific Science Foundation to Paul Oliver, Mike Lee and Steve Richards. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies