Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Behavioral response of Crotalus polystictus

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26599v1/supp-1

Image of mouse-like thermal stimuli

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26599v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Octavio I Martínez Vaca-León conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables.

Javier Manjarrez analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This study received the approval of the ethics committee of the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (Number 4047/2016SF). All subjects were treated humanely on the basis of guidelines outlined by the American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

SUBSECRETARIA DE GESTION PARA

LA PROTECCION AMBIENTAL, DIRECCION GENERAL DE VIDA SILVESTRE, SEMARNAT

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

behavioral responses of Crotalus polystictus

Funding

This study was supported by a research grant from the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (4047/2016SF). CONACYT provided postdoctoral fellowships to OI. Martínez Vaca-León. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies