Visitors   Views   Downloads

Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers

View preprint
35 days ago
RT @o2r_project: @arnaudvag Pre-print on evaluating reproducibility of research papers at the AGILE conference series - the evaluation is m…
35 days ago
@arnaudvag Pre-print on evaluating reproducibility of research papers at the AGILE conference series - the evaluation is made #reproducible with #rstats (spoiler: none of the conference papers are) https://t.co/kwgwDyIgda
RT @geotecUJI: Preprint #Reproducible #research and #GIScience an evaluation using Agile conference papers has been published in @PeerJPrep…
RT @geotecUJI: Preprint #Reproducible #research and #GIScience an evaluation using Agile conference papers has been published in @PeerJPrep…
RT @geotecUJI: Preprint #Reproducible #research and #GIScience an evaluation using Agile conference papers has been published in @PeerJPrep…
RT @nordholmen: My first ever preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/ENRDLQqemP @MarkusKonkol @f_ostermann #Scie…
RT @f_ostermann: My preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/zQ7rLsBf3v #SciencePolicy #ComputationalScience #Data…
52 days ago
Preprint #Reproducible #research and #GIScience an evaluation using Agile conference papers has been published in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/r3nmFfa9eQ
Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers https://t.co/pMdaHjo7Q0 via @PeerJPreprints
RT @f_ostermann: My preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/zQ7rLsBf3v #SciencePolicy #ComputationalScience #Data…
Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers [PeerJ Preprints] https://t.co/2xg3Tee4Wc
53 days ago
RT @nordholmen: My first ever preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/ENRDLQqemP @MarkusKonkol @f_ostermann #Scie…
My preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/zQ7rLsBf3v #SciencePolicy #ComputationalScience #DataScience
My first ever preprint has been published today in @PeerJPreprints https://t.co/ENRDLQqemP @MarkusKonkol @f_ostermann #SciencePolicy #ComputationalScience #DataScience #ReproducibleResearch
54 days ago
Reproducible research and GIScience: an evaluation using AGILE conference papers https://t.co/tiuzWGlmSF
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Analysis workflow (view)

A PDF rendering or he analysis document for viewing.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26561v1/supp-2

Analysis workflow

R Markdown document with the code to conduct the analysis and create the figures of the paper.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26561v1/supp-3

References of evaluated publications

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26561v1/supp-5

Anonymised survey responses

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26561v1/supp-6

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Barbara Hofer is member of the AGILE council (https://agile-online.org/index.php/community/council).

Author Contributions

Daniel Nüst analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Carlos Granell analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Barbara Hofer analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Markus Konkol analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Frank O Ostermann analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Rusne Sileryte analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Valentina Cerutti analyzed the data, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is the PDFs of short and full conference papers cannot be republished due to copyright restrictions.

Funding

Carlos Granell is funded by the Ramón y Cajal Programme of the Spanish government (grant number RYC-2014-16913). Daniel Nüst and Markus Konkol are supported by the project Opening Reproducible Research (https://www.uni-muenster.de/forschungaz/project/9520) funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under project numbers PE 1632/10-1 respectively KR 3930/3-1. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies