Visitors   Views   Downloads

Characterizing ecologically significant areas to evaluate marine conservation efforts in the South Brazilian Continental Shelf

View preprint
72 days ago
Characterizing ecologically significant areas to evaluate marine conservation efforts in the South Brazilian Continental Shelf https://t.co/R3Uoe8oJTj
peerJ: Characterizing ecologically significant areas to evaluate marine conservation efforts in the South Brazilian Continental Shelf https://t.co/4NQIiWqS0M
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jose H Muelbert conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Luis CP Macedo-Soares conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Micheli DP Costa conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Luciane R Favareto conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Monica MC Muelbert conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

We plan to deposit data. No definition on repository yet.

Funding

This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil) as a Grant to the Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia INCT-Mar COI (Proc. 565062/2010-7) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies