Visitors   Views   Downloads

Identification of DNA molecular markers by comparison of Pinus densiflora and Pinus sylvestris chloroplast genomes

View preprint
304 days ago
Identification of DNA molecular markers by comparison of Pinus densiflora and Pinus sylvestris chloroplast genomes https://t.co/8nzGGNuYQ6
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Pinus densiflora chloroplast genome file

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26506v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Sang-Chul Kim conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Jei-Wan Lee conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Seung-Hoon Baek performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Ji-Young Ahn performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Kyung-Nak Hong conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

P. densiflora sequences described here are accessible via GenBank accession number MF990371.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

DNA bank of Forest Genetic Resources Department

NIFS_122059323–122059343

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies