Visitors   Views   Downloads

"As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation

View preprint
RT @CoLab_Science: Micro-publications are the future of research science! https://t.co/q6Qo3s8J4D #openscience #opendata #crowdsourcedsci…
100 days ago
Micro-publications are the future of research science! https://t.co/q6Qo3s8J4D #openscience #opendata #crowdsourcedscientificmethod https://t.co/205XcL7Ig3
106 days ago
@thePeerJ fyi, I get a 404 error for: https://t.co/fS46qE39SD when clicked on from a preprint: https://t.co/BdgJqe6z91 Author deleted profile? Or just moved URL?
RT @anewmn: .@Protohedgehog recommends reading: “As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and…
RT @anewmn: .@Protohedgehog recommends reading: “As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and…
107 days ago
.@Protohedgehog recommends reading: “As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation. https://t.co/expGQDHfY2 #SPONBC2018
121 days ago
RT @mzelst: The paper ""As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation" by @chartgeri…
RT @mzelst: The paper ""As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation" by @chartgeri…
RT @mzelst: The paper ""As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation" by @chartgeri…
The paper ""As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation" by @chartgerink and me got accepted at Publications! :) Postprint found here: https://t.co/9gb6Nsa20A
"As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation https://t.co/R9MTEVep2u
RT @mzelst: .@chartgerink and I revised and resubmitted our "As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact" paper to Publications; newest version o…
.@chartgerink and I revised and resubmitted our "As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact" paper to Publications; newest version online at @PeerJPreprints! https://t.co/KC7XKlQHM7 … #openbydesign
145 days ago
"As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation https://t.co/MXakP58tTH
"As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation https://t.co/c5lqSgERJm
"As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation https://t.co/D4OnMGTl86
RT @Repositorian: #futurepaper | RT @Protohedgehog: Smart ideas: Continuous publication of research outputs as a process as a way of transf…
#futurepaper | RT @Protohedgehog: Smart ideas: Continuous publication of research outputs as a process as a way of transforming scholarly communication and evaluation https://t.co/bLslunMLm4 via @chartgerink and @mzelst
RT @RoyMeijer: "As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact" publication https://t.co/5zo4SyC2OZ via @PeerJPreprints > What does this mean for #s…
RT @RoyMeijer: "As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact" publication https://t.co/5zo4SyC2OZ via @PeerJPreprints > What does this mean for #s…
202 days ago
RT @RoyMeijer: "As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact" publication https://t.co/5zo4SyC2OZ via @PeerJPreprints > What does this mean for #s…
"As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact" publication https://t.co/5zo4SyC2OZ via @PeerJPreprints > What does this mean for #scicomm? Check #openkitchenscience and https://t.co/zoWBE5pQjR @ryhertzberger for some ideas https://t.co/Uxf68rHrSl
Smart ideas: Continuous publication of research outputs as a process as a way of transforming scholarly communication and evaluation https://t.co/hMJpLYxjm5 via @chartgerink and @mzelst
"As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation, https://t.co/pCtYGKbGaF
RT @Protohedgehog: Currently reading: "As-you-go" instead of "after-the-fact": A network approach to scholarly communication and evaluation…
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Track changes from previous preprint

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26462v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Chris HJ Hartgerink prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Marino van Zelst prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any data because it is a description of ideas and its related concepts.

Funding

This work was supported by the Mozilla Science Fellowship (2017; awarded to CHJH). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies