NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

A newer version of this Preprint is available: View the latest version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Karen Dyson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper, contacted researchers with appropriate experience, led workshop on subject..

Carly Ziter conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper, suggested and contacted researchers with appropriate experience..

Tracy L Fuentes conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

M S Patterson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper, suggested and contacted researchers with appropriate experience..

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The University of Washington Human Subjects Division granted a 'Determination of Exempt Status', finding that the research is exempt from the federal human subjects regulations, including the requirments for IRB approval and continuing review.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate any code. Interview data is restricted as it relates to human subjects. The study can readily be replicated by interviewing ecologists who have worked on urban residential, commercial, or other private property.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads