NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

R Analysis Script

R script implementing various multilevel logistic regressions using the "rethinking" and "rstan" packages as a frontend for the Stan programming language.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26453v1/supp-1

Experiment 1 Data

Anonymized data collected from all participants in Experiment 1.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26453v1/supp-2

Experiment 2 Dataset

Anonymized data collected from all participants in Experiment 2.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26453v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Tina Kao conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Greg Jensen conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Charlotte Michaelcheck performed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Vincent P Ferrera conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Herbert S Terrace conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Columbia University's Institutional Review Board granted ethical approval to carry out the study within its facilities (protocol AAAA7861)

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3976566.v1

Funding

This work was supported by US National Institute of Mental Health, grant number NIH-MH081153 awarded to Vincent Ferrera and Herbert Terrace, and by PSC CUNY Research 60583-00 48, awarded to Tina Kao. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
1 Citation   Views   Downloads