NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Strict consensus of the MPTs obtained from the phylogenetic analysis

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26450v1/supp-1

Selected measurements of the postcranial bones of the holotype and referred specimens of Buitreraptor gonzalezorum

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26450v1/supp-2

Character list used for phylogenetic analysis

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26450v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Federico A Gianechini conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Peter J Makovicky conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sebastián Apesteguía conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ignacio Cerda conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been provided as Supplemental Files

Funding

This work was supported by a NASA astrobiology grant to The Field Museum, funds of the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2014-1449), The Jurassic Foundation and the American Museum of Natural History Collection Study Grant Program to FG, awards from the US National Science Foundation to PJM (EAR 0228607, ANT 1246379, PLR 1341645, EAR 1450143), and CONICET to FG, SA and IC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
1 Citation   Views   Downloads