Visitors   Views   Downloads

Historical contingency, niche conservatism and the tendency for some taxa to be more diverse towards the poles

View preprint
38 days ago
Historical contingency, niche conservatism and the tendency for some taxa to be more diverse towards the poles https://t.co/OHmm4aZTEv
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental files including Appendices S1-S7

Appendix S1 Species list and classification.

Appendix S2 Detailed results from MEMs.

Appendix S3 Model verification.

Appendix S4 Moran’s I spatial autocorrelation analyses.

Appendix S5 Phylogenetic analyses of variation in richness-temperature slopes.

Appendix S6 Cross-predictions among phylogenetic models of climatic tolerances.

Appendix S7 Diversification analyses for the subsets of colonizers and sedentary mammal species.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26440v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Ignacio Morales-Castilla conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jonathan T Davies conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Miguel Ángel Rodríguez conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

GitHub

https://github.com/MoralesCastilla/Reversed-richness/tree/master/data

Funding

I.M.-C. received support by the Fonds de Recherches du Québec - Nature et Technologies (FQRNT) programme, Projet de Recherche en Équipe and is currently supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship by the Programa Propio de la Universidad de Alcalá. The Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain awarded a grant to M.A.R. (CGL2013-48768-P). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies