NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Christopher R Noto is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Joseph E Peterson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jonathan P Warnock conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Shawn L Eberhart conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Steven R Clawson analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Christopher R Noto analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This work was conducted under the Permit number UT12-003E issued by the Bureau of Land Management.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Supplementary Files are reposited in Figshare at the following URL:

https://figshare.com/articles/Peterson_et_al_CLDQ_Taphonomy_Supplemental_Tables/4238906

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh Faculty Development Fund (Grant No. FDM250). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads