Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Figure 8 - Foci formation of the shorter construct MEKS2AXH, aa 329-561 of ataxin-1.

Figure 8 - Foci formation of the shorter construct MEKS2AXH, aa 329-561 of ataxin-1.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.259v2/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Annalise Pastore is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Rajesh Menon conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Daniel Soong conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Cesira de Chiara conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mark Holt conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

John McCormick performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

N. Anilkumar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Annalisa Pastore wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Grant Disclosures

The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:

The work was supported by the MRC (Grant ref. U117584256), from Ataxia UK.

Funding

The work was supported by the MRC (Grant ref. U117584256), from Ataxia UK and from the British Heart Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies