Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Prisma 2009 checklist Meijer et al

Prisma 2009 checklist Meijer et al

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2560v1/supp-2

Supplementary info 1. Raw data used for meta analysis

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2560v1/supp-3

Supplementary info 2. Raw data Meijer et al 2009 unpublished

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2560v1/supp-4

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Kim Meijer is an employee of Altenburg & Wymenga Ecological Consultants and Menno Schilthuizen is an employee of Naturalis Biodiversity Center

Author Contributions

Kim Meijer conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Menno Schilthuizen contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Leo Beukeboom contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Christian Smit contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a supplementary file.

Funding

This work was supported by the Uyttenboogaart-Eliasen Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies