Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its additional files in Supplemental Files

Supplemental File 1. Pairwise uncorrected p-distance between 31 unique U. yaschenkoi haplotypes and three outgroup haplotypes (U. novaehollandiae and two U. manicatus). Haplotypes were generated from the concatenated partial sequences of COXI and 16S loci. Supplemental File 2. Pairwise uncorrected p-distance between 13 unique U. yaschenkoi haplotypes generated from the partial 28S sequence. Supplemental File 3. List of haplotype numbers assigned to the U. yaschenkoi samples. Supplemental File 4. Measures (in mm) of seven morphological traits in 39 U. yaschenkoi adult females.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2541v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Authors declare no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Karen Luna-Ramirez conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper.

Adam D Miller analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Gordana Rašić analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

The sequences described here are accessible via GenBank accession numbers KP176717 to KP176786.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a supplementary file.

Funding

KLR was supported by scholarships from CONACyT and from The Hugh Williamson Foundation, through Museum Victoria. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies