NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Supplementary Figure 1: Integrative three-dimensional reconstruction of the skull and endocranial morphology of Pelagosaurus typus (BRLSI M1413)

Note, best viewed with CAD Optimized Lighting.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2539v1/supp-1

Supplementary Figure 2: Integrative three-dimensional reconstruction of the skull and endocranial morphology of Gavialis gangeticus (UMZC R 5792)

Note, best viewed with CAD Optimized Lighting.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2539v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Stephanie E Pierce is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Author Contributions

Stephanie E Pierce conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Megan Williams performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Roger BJ Benson analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Interactive 3D PDFs of the anatomical reconstructions are provided as supplementary figures to this paper. In addition, the CT data for Gavialis gangeticus has been reposited in the University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge, and the CT data for Pelagosaurus typus is stored on DigiMorph (http://digimorph.org/specimens/Pelagosaurus_typus/whole/).

Once the paper is accepted for publication, we will make the official inquiries to submit our 3D object files to MorphoMuseum; although the final decision is up to the museums that hold copyright to the specimens.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads