Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Mark D Wilkinson conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Ruben Verborgh conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, performed the computation work, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Santos conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Tim Clark conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Morris A Swertz conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Fleur D.L. Kelpin conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Alasdair J. G. Gray conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Erik A. Schultes conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Erik M. van Mulligen conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Paolo Ciccarese conceived and designed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mark Thompson conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Rajaram Kaliyaperumal conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jerven T. Bolleman analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper, fixed the demonstrative query, clarified the semantics of UniProt, corrected erroneous ontological annotations;.

Michel Dumontier conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The manuscript describes a set of practices and behaviors that combine third-party technologies and standards in a novel manner. This does not (necessarily) require novel, dedicated software, and therefore a repository is not provided. The paper uses only public data for its demonstration, and the query to retrieve that data from-source is provided in the manuscript text (the curator of that data is UniProt, the data is being used/republished with their explicit permission, and a member of their team is a co-author on the manuscript).

Funding

The lead author is supported by the Fundacion BBVA + UPM Isaac Peral programme, and the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad grant number TIN2014-55993-R. Additional support for FAIR Skunkworks members comes from European Union funded projects ELIXIR-EXCELERATE (H2020 no. 676559), ADOPT BBMRI-ERIC (H2020 no. 676550) and CORBEL (H2020 no. 654248). Portions of this work have been funded by Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Odex4all project), Stichting Topconsortium voor Kennis en Innovatie High Tech Systemen en Materialen (FAIRdICT project), BBMRI-NL, RD-Connect and ELIXIR (Rare disease implementation study FP7 no. 305444). UniProt is mainly supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) and National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) grant U41HG007822. Swiss-Prot activities at the SIB are supported by the Swiss Federal Government through the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation SERI. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies