Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Supplementary text

Includes two supplementary tables and two supplementary figures

Table S1

Table S2

Figure S1

Figure S2

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2453v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jessica M Morrison performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Chelsea L Murphy performed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Kristina Baker performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Richard Zamor contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Steve J Nikolai contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Shawn Wilder performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Mostafa S Elshahed conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Noha H Youssef conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

DNA Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:

Genbank. The sequences are deposited in the SRA database under accession number SRP083898.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The research in this article did not generate, collect or analyse any raw data or code.

Funding

This work has been supported by the National Science Foundation Microbial Observatories program (grant no. MCB_0240683), and the Oklahoma State University Start-up fund (NY). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies