Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Landmark values for traditional morphometric analysis

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2450v1/supp-1

Landmark values for geometric analysis

Table S2. Landmark values for geometric morphometric analysis for Asian citrus psyllids reared on different host plants.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2450v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Thomson M. Paris conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Sandra A. Allan conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David G. Hall conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Matthew G. Hentz performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Gabriella Hetesy performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Philip A. Stansly conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data is provided as supplementary files.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Citrus Research and Development Foundation (701). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies