Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Testing hairiness as a predicitor of SVD for a different flower type

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2433v1/supp-5

Variation in entropy values between different photos of the same specimen

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2433v1/supp-6

Relationships between mean entropy for each body region and mean single visit pollen deposition on Actinidia deliciosa

Relationships between mean entropy for each body region and mean single visit pollen deposition (SVD) on Actinidia deliciosa for 7 different insect pollinator species. Black lines are regressions for simple linear models.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2433v1/supp-8

Intraspecific variation in pollinator hairiness

Intraspecific variation in entropy values across different body regions of insect pollinators used in our study. Boxes represent the interquartile range, horizontal lines within boxes are median values, whiskers are the range and single dots are outliers.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2433v1/supp-9

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jamie R Stavert conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Gustavo Liñán-Cembrano conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jacqueline R Beggs conceived and designed the experiments, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Brad G Howlett conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

David E Pattemore conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments.

Ignasi Bartomeus conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a supplementary file.

Funding

This research was supported by the University of Auckland and MBIE C11X1309 Bee Minus to Bee Plus and Beyond: Higher Yields From Smarter, Growth-focused Pollination Systems. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies