Your institution has a plan with PeerJ, so that you don't have to pay to publish Open Access. See if you qualify

Read for yourself

why authors & institutions are choosing to publish in PeerJ.
Author interviews / Institutional case studies
PrePrint: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the college classroom: Knowledge, attitudes, and concerns...
  Visitors   Views   Downloads
 
 
Visitors
 
Views
 
Downloads
View all metrics + mentions on the Web
PREPRINT - PeerJ PrePrints is not a peer-reviewed venue.

Additional Information

Competing Interests

There are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Nicanor Austriaco conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

IRB# - IRB00007026

Institution/Organization # - IORG0005826

Federal assurance # - FWA00014558

The study was approved by the IRB under Exemption #2 on June 21, 2011.

Grant Disclosures

The following grant information was disclosed by the authors:

NIGMS R15 GM094712

NSF MRI-R2 0959354

NIH Grant 2 P20 RR016457

Funding

My research laboratory is supported by the following grants: NIGMS R15 GM094712, NSF MRI-R2 0959354, NIH Grant 2 P20 RR016457 to the Rhode Island INBRE Program for student training, and a CAFR faculty research grant from Providence College. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)