Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Dataset of the study: Positive effect of dietary lutein and cholesterol on the undirected song activity of an opportunistic breeder

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2411v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Stefania Casagrande conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables.

Rianne Pinxten conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Erika Zaid performed the experiments, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Marcel Eens conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The study was approved by the ethical committee for animal experiments (ECD) of the University of Antwerp (ID number: 2014-21).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Edmond Repository, Max Planck Digital Library.

http://edmond.mpdl.mpg.de/imeji/collection/ldlgaaT46nzyL2YW/item/FDH2CfUwW_IWwQ

Funding

S.C. was supported by a FWO post- doctoral Pegasus Marie Curie Fellowship (grant 05-05-1.2.205.13N). RP and ME were supported by the University of Antwerp (TOPBOF) and FWO- Flanders. EZ was supported by an Erasmus Placement program. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies