Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

Response time

Raw data of female response time in call preference experiments.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2408v1/supp-1

The number of responsed and no responsed females

The number of females that met and did not meet the response criterion in experiment 1-3.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2408v1/supp-2

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Longhui Zhao conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jichao Wang conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Steven E. Brauth wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Yezhong Tang wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Jianguo Cui conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Animal Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

All animal procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Chengdu Institute of Biology, CAS (CIB2015061022).

Field Study Permissions

The following information was supplied relating to field study approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The frogs were used for the experiments with the permission of the management office of the Mt. Diaoluo nature reserve (DNR2015062003).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a supplementary file

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 31270042 (J.C.), 31260518 (J.W.), Youth Professor Project of CIB (J.C.), and Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (J.C.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies