Visitors   Views   Downloads
NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

Supplemental Information

COPASI file (Strongyloides.cps) are within this compressed file implementing the model; a library of piecewise defined functions (worm.cpk) to reproduce concentrations of immune system sub-entities

Additional file 1 — An SBML file format for Strongyloides infection The SBML file was generated by the COPASI tool but can be managed by any SBML level 2 compliant program. An SBML (Strongyloides.xml) and a native COPASI file (Strongyloides.cps) formats are within this compressed file, both implementing the same model. There is also a library of piecewise defined functions (worm.cpk) to reproduce concentrations of immune system sub-entities.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2399v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Marcelo A Levenhagen analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper, expertise knowledge about the parasite.

Gustavo A Ferreira analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Getúlio M Pereira analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Anderson R Santos conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data has been supplied as a supplementary file.

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies