SLIMM: Species level identification of microorganisms from metagenomes

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany
Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.2378v1
Subject Areas
Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, Genomics, Microbiology, Taxonomy
Keywords
Metagenomics, Microbial Communities, Microorganisms, Taxonomic Profiling, NGS Data, Microbiology
Copyright
© 2016 Dadi et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Dadi TH, Renard B, Wieler LH, Semmler T, Reinert K. 2016. SLIMM: Species level identification of microorganisms from metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 4:e2378v1

Abstract

Identification and quantification of microorganisms is an important step in studying the alpha and beta diversities within and between microbial communities respectively. Both, identification and quantification of a given microbial community can be carried out using whole genome shotgun sequences with less bias than using 16S-rRNA sequences. However, shared regions of DNA among reference genomes and taxonomic units pose a significant challenge in assigning reads correctly to their true origins. The existing microbial community profiling tools commonly deal with this problem by either preparing signature-based unique references or assigning an ambiguous read to its least common ancestor in a taxonomic tree. The former method is limited to making use of the reads which can be mapped to the curated regions, while the later suffer from the lack of uniquely-mapping reads at higher (more specific) taxonomic ranks. Moreover, even if the tools exhibited generally good performance in calling the organisms present in a sample, there is room for improvement in calling the correct relative abundance of the organisms. We present a new method Species Level Identification of Microorganisms from Metagenomes (SLIMM) which addresses the above issues by using coverage information of reference genomes to remove unlikely genomes from the analysis and subsequently gain more uniquely-mapping reads to assign at higher ranks of a taxonomic tree. SLIMM is based on a few, seemingly easy steps which lead to a tool that outperforms state-of-the-art tools in run-time and/or memory usage while being on par or better in computing quantitative and qualitative information at the species level.

Author Comment

This submission is intended for the GCB2016 Conference Collection.

Supplemental Information

Supplimentary table

Contains:

Details of datasets used for the study

Accuracy comparison of different methods per datasets

Runtime for each dataset

Statistical details (STDDEV, MEAN, Variance, Q1, Q2(median), Q3 ) of the difference b/n real and predicted abundance

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2378v1/supp-1

Figure S1: Precision - Recall Curves: SLIMM vs Existing Methods

Precision - Recall Curves: SLIMM vs Existing Methods across 8 different datasets

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2378v1/supp-2

Figure S2: Precision - Recall Curves: Different SLIMM variants

Precision - Recall Curves of Different SLIMM variants across 8 different datasets

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2378v1/supp-3

Figure S3. Violin Plots of the difference between real and predicted abundances: SLIMM vs Existing Methods

Violin Plots of the difference between real and predicted abundances: SLIMM vs Existing Methods across 8 different datasets

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2378v1/supp-4

Figure S4: Violin Plots of the difference between real and predicted abundances: Different SLIMM variants

Violin Plots of the difference between real and predicted abundances: Different SLIMM variants across 8 different datasets

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2378v1/supp-5

Figure S5: predicted vs real abundances: SLIMM vs Existing Methods

Predicted vs real abundances: SLIMM vs Existing Methods across 8 different datasets

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2378v1/supp-6

Figure S6: predicted vs real abundances: Different SLIMM variants

Predicted vs real abundances: Different SLIMM variants across 8 different datasets

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.2378v1/supp-7