A clinical audit cycle of post-operative hypothermia in dogs

Western Veterinary Specialist and Emergency Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Veterinary Clinical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
DOI
10.7287/peerj.preprints.2350v1
Subject Areas
Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Veterinary Medicine
Keywords
anaesthesia, surgery, canine, normothermia, temperature
Copyright
© 2016 Rose et al.
Licence
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
Cite this article
Rose N, Kwong GP, Pang DS. 2016. A clinical audit cycle of post-operative hypothermia in dogs. PeerJ Preprints 4:e2350v1

Abstract

Objectives: Use of clinical audits to assess and improve perioperative hypothermia management in client-owned dogs. Methods: Two clinical audits were performed. Audit 1: data were collected to determine the incidence and duration of perioperative hypothermia (defined rectal temperatures < 37.5˚C). The results from Audit 1 were presented to clinic staff and a consensus reached on changes to be implemented to improve temperature management. Following one month with the changes in place, Audit 2 was performed to assess performance. Results: Audit 1 revealed a high incidence of post-operative hypothermia (88.9%) and prolonged time periods for animals to reach normothermia. Following discussion, a consensus was reached to: 1. measure rectal temperatures hourly post-operatively until a temperature ≥ 37.5˚C was achieved and 2. use a forced air warmer on all dogs until rectal temperature was ≥ 37˚5. After one month with the implemented changes, Audit 2 identified a significant reduction in the time to achieve a rectal temperature of ≥ 37.5˚C, with 75% of dogs achieving this goal by 3.5 hours (7.5 hours for Audit 1, p = 0.01). The incidence of hypothermia at extubation remained high in Audit 2 (97.3% with a rectal temperature < 37.5˚C). Clinical significance: Post-operative hypothermia was improved through simple changes in practice, showing that clinical audit is a useful tool for monitoring post-operative hypothermia and improving patient care. Overall management of perioperative hypothermia could be further improved with earlier intervention.

Author Comment

This paper describes a complete clinical audit cycle where a clinical problem, hypothermia, was identified through prospective data collection and changes implemented following consensus discussion to achieve a measurable improvement. The manuscript is in press with the Journal of Small Animal Practice. Note, the accepted version includes changes to data analysis, though the conclusions are unaffected.